My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
New Ad - Free
Search

Buy & Sell

Used (Like New) $20

Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 1 Year, 11 Months ago
Mamtersasf
Expert Boarder
Posts: 104
graph
User Offline
 
Some of you might have noticed that while on my old song. 'Black Lung Suicide' there were 8 lines of lyrics and 11 guitar solos, on my new song 'Sober and Celibate' there are 12 lines of lyrics and only 8 guitar solos. This shows a progression in my music towards playing more for the song. This raises the question of course, is this a step in the right direction?

Jarl Sigurd

to listen to Jarl Sigurd starting to play for the song, visit: http://www.ampcast.com/JarlSigurd and download 'Sober and Celibate'
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Year, 11 Months ago
paulsonjack
Senior Boarder
Posts: 68
graphgraph
User Offline
 
See if can find a good version of John Cage's 4 minutes 33 seconds.

That would be the best direction to take at this stage IMHO.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Year, 11 Months ago
Vgtrzubx
Expert Boarder
Posts: 85
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Jarl Sigurd Wrote:

A while ago, you wrote that commercial success depended on the number of guitar solos ( or was it the length of...? ), and argued that more was better than few.

Have you changed your mind, or isn't commercial success the goal anymore?

My music consists of nothing but guitar solos, but I hardly think the 130 plays to date on www.mp3.com/jalluhm can be described as commercial success
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Year, 11 Months ago
bluelou
Senior Boarder
Posts: 69
graphgraph
User Offline
 
More are definitely better. Who needs quality when you can have QUANTITY!

No, I just though I'd experiment by having a song with only 8 guitar solos. It's called minimalism!

Maybe you should add some growled vocals.

Jarl Sigurd

to listen to music that combines growled vocals with Jazz visit: http://www.ampcast.com/search/band.php?id=9098
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Year, 11 Months ago
Alfred
Expert Boarder
Posts: 87
graphgraph
User Offline
 
maybe... I'll start practising my growling rigth away. I just hope the landlord won't throw me out : )
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Year, 11 Months ago
Linda2
Expert Boarder
Posts: 88
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Jarl, could you tell me a bit more about how your songs came to be on ampcast.com? Do they charge you a fee to house your mp3's, etc.. You can just email me directly if you prefer. Thank you;
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Year, 11 Months ago
bglose
Senior Boarder
Posts: 77
graphgraph
User Offline
 
I joined ampcast in March of 2001 after mp3.com changed its policy stating that only Premium Artists who pay $19.99 a month will be paid artist royalties. Contrary to the claims a certain Chris Johnson of rec.audio.pro has made, I did not get kicked off of mp3.com. I still have an account there; You can visit my site http://www.mp3.com/JarlSigurd and listen to my cello concerto that is posted there.

They didn't when I joined. They later introduced one. It currently stands at $50 a year but is set to go up to $75 at the beginning of 2002.

Jarl Sigurd

to listen to music composed by Jarl Sigurd, visit: http://www.ampcast.com/JarlSigurd
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
 
Copyright © 2006 - Jan 2009 My Chord Space